Denis Claude



  • Home
  • Research
  • Teaching
  • CV
  • Pictures
  • Contact

MY SCHOLARLY CONTRIBUTIONS

All of the documents are in pdf format and require Adobe Acrobat Reader which can be downloaded here. Feel free to contact me, shall you have any comments or suggestions.  


ARTICLES IN JOURNALS



A New Rationale for Not Picking Low-Hanging Fruits: the Separation of Ownership and Control (with Mabel Tidball),  Environmental Modeling and Assessment (2020)

Recent attempts at explaining the energy-efficiency gap rely on considerations related to organizational and behavioral/cognitive failures. In this paper, we build on the strategic delegation literature to advance a complementary explanation. We show that strategic market interaction may encourage business owners to instill a bias against energy efficiency in managerial compensation contracts. Since managers respond to financial incentives, their decisions will reflect this bias, resulting in a lack of investment.


A reconsideration of the link between vertical externality and managerial incentives,  Managerial and Decision Economics (2019)

Previous research revealed that the strategic role of delegation contracts disappears if two quantity‐setting firms outsource input production to a monopolistic supplier. I show that this role is restored if the assumption of a downstream duopoly is relaxed. Thus, delegation contracts allow downstream profit‐maximizing owners to commit their firms to a behavior that differs from their preferences. This behavior varies nonmonotonically with the number of firms in the downstream market. Corresponding deviations from profit maximization are larger if the upstream monopolist makes a price precommitment. But little to no deviation occurs if the number of firms is large.


Regulation of investments in infrastructure: the interplay between strategy behaviors and initial endowments (with Charles Figuieres and Mabel Tidball),  The Journal of Public Economic Theory  (2012).

This paper explores the dynamic properties of price-based policies in a model of competition between two jurisdictions that invest over time in infrastructures to increase the quality of environment, a global public good. Jurisdictions are identical in all respects but the initial stock of infrastructures. This is a dynamic type of heterogeneity that disappears in the long run. Therefore, at the steady-state, usual intuitions from static settings apply: identical jurisdictions inefficiently under-invest, calling for public subsidies. In the short-run, however, counterintuitive properties are established: i) although investments produce positive externalities, corrective policies can take first the form of taxes before turning into subsidies in the long-run, ii) one jurisdiction can be temporarily taxed whereas the other is subsidized. It is shown how these phenomena are related to initial conditions.


Efficiency Inducing Taxation in Mixed Oligopolies with Stock Pollutants: An irrelevance result (with Mabel Tidball),  Economics Bulletin (2010)

The purpose of this paper is to characterize the socially optimal tax rule in a mixed oligopoly market where a i) partially privatized firm compete with several private competitors and ii) production causes social damages that accumulates over time. Our paper shows that tax rules which decentralize the socially optimal timepath of production as an open-loop or a closed-loop Nash equilibrium of the mixed oligopoly game are independent of the degree of privatization.


Investment in Tourism Market and Reputation (with Georges Zaccour), The Journal of Public Economic Theory (2009)

We consider a dynamic model of competition between tourist resorts located in a same region. Resorts behave strategically in selecting both their tourist flows and levels of investment in pollution abatement. Jointly, these decisions determine the environmental quality of the tourist product, a characteristic that the consumer is unable to observe at the time of purchase. We suppose that consumers base their purchasing decisions on the reputation of the tourist region which constitutes the state variable in the differential game. Resorts’ equilibrium strategies are characterized and compared to the strategies that would obtain if resorts’ investment decisions were delegated to a regional authority.


Tax Differentials and the Segmentation of Networks of Cooperation in Oligopoly (with Hassan Benchekroun), The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics (2007)

This note study the effects of uncoordinated environmental tax policies on firms’ incentives to form bilateral R&D collaborations. It is shown that the complete network is pair-wise stable for small differences in the taxation of environmental emissions. Larger tax differentials may induce firms to broke all their international collaborations.


Strategic Privatization and Regulation Policy in Mixed Markets (with Jean Hindriks), The Icfai Journal of Managerial Economics (2006)

We consider mixed oligopoly markets for differentiated goods where private and public firms compete either in prices or quantities. We then study the welfare effect of privatization interpreted as partial strategic delegation of the public firm to a private manager with profit concern. It is shown that partial privatization improves welfare with quantity competition when goods are substitutes, and with price competition when goods are complements. However full privatization (complete delegation to private manager) can never be optimal. It is also shown that the public firm can make more profit than the private firm in equilibrium, and that this possibility is more likely under quantity competition. Turning to market regulation policy, we find: (i) that public and private firms should be taxed the same; and (ii) that price regulation is better than quantity regulation.



CONTRIBUTIONS TO BOOKS


Managerial Incentives and Polluting Inputs Under Imperfect Competition, In Games in Management Science: Essays in Honor of Georges Zaccour, Series: International Series in Operations Research and Management Science (ISOR, Vol.280), Pierre-Olivier Pineau, Simon Sigué and Sihem Taboubi Editors, Springer-Nature, 2020, pp. 165-186.

This paper focuses on the economic assessment of environmental policies that rely on the participation and cooperation of local communities. It argues that such policies have an intrinsic value that is ignored by the usual methods of economic valuation. This omission results from an adhesion to welfarism, a doctrine according to which the evaluation of public policy should be based solely on its consequences in terms of individual utilities. A number of authors reject this doctrine, however. They stress that public policy should not be narrowly interpreted as the choice of a social state since it also involves a choice among procedures. Indeed, different public policies involve different procedures that incorporate rights, opportunities and benefits to individuals. Furthermore, different procedures may possess different intrinsic and/or instrumental values. This paper argues that taking into account the intrinsic value of procedures has implications for the recommendations that can be made in terms of environmental policies: i.e., it may allow cooperative and participative policies to measure up against other forms of public policies.

Valuing co-operation and participation : a challenge to standard normative economics, In Environmental Cooperation and Institutional Change, Series: New Horizons in Environmental Economics, Konrad Hagedorn ed., Edward Elgar, 2002, pp. 26-45.

This paper focuses on the economic assessment of environmental policies that rely on the participation and cooperation of local communities. It argues that such policies have an intrinsic value that is ignored by the usual methods of economic valuation. This omission results from an adhesion to welfarism, a doctrine according to which the evaluation of public policy should be based solely on its consequences in terms of individual utilities. A number of authors reject this doctrine, however. They stress that public policy should not be narrowly interpreted as the choice of a social state since it also involves a choice among procedures. Indeed, different public policies involve different procedures that incorporate rights, opportunities and benefits to individuals. Furthermore, different procedures may possess different intrinsic and/or instrumental values. This paper argues that taking into account the intrinsic value of procedures has implications for the recommendations that can be made in terms of environmental policies: i.e., it may allow cooperative and participative policies to measure up against other forms of public policies.

WORKING PAPERS

 

Regulation of Brown and Green Firms (with Georges Zaccour)